Canadian Bankruptcy Reform. Changes to the Bankruptcy Laws.
NEWS FLASH, DECEMBER 14, 2007- It was announced today that Bill C-12 - an Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, the Wage Earner Protection Program Act and Chapter 47 of the Statutes of Canada, 2005 has received Royal Assent.
This has caught everyone by surprise as the Senate was scheduled to hear 21 more witnesses in February, 2008. It is also surprising given that when the last bankruptcy bill was rammed through a few years ago the Senate committee expressed its disappointment in the “fast tracking” of the legislation that did not allow it to hear the many groups that were scheduled to make representations. As a result the Senate Committee received assurances that there would be the opportunity for the Senate Committee to review the legislation in early 2006 and that the legislation would not come into force until June 30, 2006 at the earliest. The Minister of Industry, David L. Emerson, confirmed this in a letter dated November 24, 2005.
Speculation is that a federal election is imminent. If Parliament is dissolved for the election before the Bill received Royal Assent, the next Parliament would have to start over from the beginning, with a new Bill. No one in Parliament wants this, because of the election advantage of having the new wage protection scheme passed into law.
Our best estimate is that the changes will come into force in about 12 months from December 14, 2007.
The Department of Labour will need this time in order to set up the Wage Earner Protection Program (WEPP), including program design, infrastructure development, staff training, and prepare the WEPP Act regulations.
The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, which is responsible for regulations under the BIA and CCAA, will also need this time to complete consultations on regulations, preparation of forms and updating their computer systems to undertake their new role supervising CCAA proceedings.
For more information please refer to the following:
Summary of the Major Changes Affecting Consumer Bankruptcy
High Income Tax Debt: Bankrupt individuals with more than $200 000 in personal income tax debts representing 75 percent or more of their total unsecured liabilities will not be eligible for an automatic discharge. These individuals will have to seek a Court order to be discharged of their debts. They will have to convince the Court that the relief they are seeking is justified on the basis of their efforts to repay their debts, their financial situation when the debt was incurred and their future financial prospects. The Court will be able to fix conditions on the discharge. Specifically, the Court may refuse to discharge these individuals from bankruptcy, suspend their discharge for a period of time, or require the bankrupt to comply with any requirement as the Court may direct. This is meant to be an anti-abuse measure targeting high-income individuals who may strategically use bankruptcy to avoid paying large income tax debts.
Exemption for RRSPs: RRSP and RRIF exemptions will be in accordance with the laws of the province where the provinces have such exemptions. The provinces that have RRSP and RRIF exemptions are Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.
This wording change will result in the following:
;
A one year claw back will only be in effect for RRSPs in provinces without RRSP exemption laws;
There will be no upper cap on the amount of RRSPs that can be protected;
There will be no need to set up the RRSPs in a locked in plan to make them eligible for exemption;
The court will have no jurisdiction to extend the one year claw back period period in an appropriate case.
Dollar Threshold for a Consumer Proposal is Raised: A consumer debtor can now be considered for filing a consumer proposal if the individual's aggregate debts, excluding debts secured by the individual's principal residence, are not more that $250,000. This is an increase from $75,000.
Mandatory Surplus Income Payments: Bankrupts will be required to make surplus income payments to the estate in accordance with directives issued by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. Trustees will no longer have the discretion to recommend that a bankrupt should pay less of their surplus income than the amount determined according to the Superintendent's directive.
First-time bankrupts with surplus income will be required to make payments for nine months. If, at that end of the nine-month period, the surplus remains, the bankrupt will be required to make additional payments for a further 12 months and for a further time as the Court may order.
Second-time bankrupts with surplus income will be required to make payments for 24 months. If the surplus income remains after 24 months, the bankrupt will be required to make surplus income payments for a further 12 months and for such further time as the Court may order. The changes are intended to require bankrupts who have the financial ability to make reasonable contributions to their creditors to do so prior to obtaining their discharge.
Automatic Discharge of Second-Time Bankrupts: Second-time bankrupts will be eligible for an automatic discharge after 24 months from the date of bankruptcy. This measure will only apply to those who have completed mandatory counselling and who have made payments of their surplus income to the creditors.
Student Loans: Student loan debt will be eligible for discharge in bankruptcy if seven years have passed since the former student has terminated his/her studies. In addition, in cases of undue hardship, a bankrupt may apply to the Court to obtain the discharge of the student loans after five years. For the Court to discharge on hardship grounds, it must be satisfied that the debtor has acted in good faith and is expected to continue to experience financial difficulties.
Note: The "hardship provision" will be available to those people whose date of bankruptcy was prior to the coming into force of this provision.
Prohibition on Ipso Facto Clauses in Bankruptcy: The amendments place limits on the exercise of "ipso facto" contract clauses in bankruptcy. An ipso facto clause is a contractual term that generally allows a creditor to terminate a contract or a supply of service if an individual enters into proceedings under an insolvency statute. For consumers, the primary concern over ipso facto clauses relates to basic services, such as telephone, gas, electricity and leases. This prohibition previously existed only in the case of consumer proposals and is now extended to bankruptcy situations.
Recent History of Canadian Bankruptcy Reform
News Flash! November 27, 2007. Senate hearings on Bill C-12 (Canada's New Bankruptcy Laws) start on Thursday November 29, 2007.
We are advised that the Senate hearings will be held on Wednesdays 4 - 6 pm and Thursdays 10:45 am -1:00 pm until Parliament breaks in mid December. They will resume after Parliament returns in late January, 2008 and likely continue into February.
If the Bill is enacted it will likely be 12 months before the new laws go into effect.
News Flash! October 25, 2007. Bankruptcy Reform is back on track. The Conservative government reinstated the Bankruptcy Reform package on Thursday, October 25, 2007, in a motion that was approved by all parties. The bankruptcy package had died when parliament was last prorogued.
June 13, 2007 - Bankruptcy Reform Back on track. First reading passes in the House.
Bill C-62, an Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, the Wage Earner Protection Program Act and chapter 47 of the Statutes of Canada, 2005received first reading in the House of Commons this date.
The Bill had been hung up in the House over the issue of exempting RRSPs and RRIFs. The Bloc Québécois refused to approve passing of the Bill as it felt that the wording concerning RRSPs and RRIFs infringed on Quebec's jurisdiction. In order to get the Bill passed unanimously, the wording concerning RRSPs and RRIFs was changed to make RRSP and RRIF exemptions in accordance with the laws of the province where the provinces have such exemptions. The provinces that have RRSP and RRIF exemptions are Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.
This wording change will result in the following:
A one year claw back will only be in effect for RRSPs in provinces without RRSP exemption laws;
There will be no upper cap on the amount of RRSPs that can be protected;
There will be no need to set up the RRSPs in a locked in plan to make them eligible for exemption;
The court will have no jurisdiction to extend the one year claw back period period in an appropriate case.
Insolvency professionals and everyone interested in a fair and just bankruptcy system will be very upset with the proposed change to RRSPs. The change in wording governing the exemption of RRSPs opens the system up to abuse.as a person will be able to set aside funds in an RRSP thereby protecting them in a bankruptcy and then once the person is discharge the funds can be used with impunity.
The Bill still has to go to the Senate, probably in the fall. The Senate can be expected to give the bill a thorough review, including hearing expert testimony.
December 13, 2006 - Parliament adjourned on December 13, 2006 and will not return until January 29, 2007. This postpones any vote on the Ways and Means motion to introduce an Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, the Wage Earner Protection Program Act and chapter 47 of the Statutes of Canada, 2005.
News Flash! December 11, 2006 - The Minister of Labour, Jean-Pierre Blackburn introduced a ways and means motion on December 11, 2006, to introduce an Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, the Wage Earner Protection Program Act and chapter 47 of the Statutes of Canada, 2005.
The next step is a vote on the motion and introduction of the actual bill.
Bankruptcy Reform on Hold:
Wednesday, April 12th, 2006 - The Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP) advised their member today that it is highly unlikely that the changes to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act will be proclaimed prior to 2007. More...
Canadian Bankruptcy Reform is rushed into law to beat
the non confidence vote held on November 28, 2005.
Canadian Bankruptcy reform legislation has been passed into law with Senate approval and Royal assent on November 25, 2005.
New Law will not come into force until June 30, 2006 at the earliest. The Senate committee expressed its disappointment in the "fast tracking" of the legislation that did not allow it to hear the many groups that were scheduled to make representations. As a result the Senate Committee received assurances that there would be the opportunity for the Senate Committee to review the legislation in early 2006 and that the legislation would not come into force until June 30, 2006 at the earliest. The Minister of Industry, David L. Emerson, confirmed this in a letter dated November 24, 2005.
September 28 - October 5, 2005 - Second Reading in Parliament
October 5, 2005 - Referred to Committee - (Industry, Natural Resources, Science and Technology). Hearings are estimated to begin in early November, 2005;
Government "fast tracks" bill in order to beat the non-confidence vote of November 28, 2005: November 21, 2005 - Third Reading in Parliament; November 25, 2005 - Third Reading in the Senate. November 25, 2005 - Royal Assent.
News Flash! November 21, 2005.
Government to ram through Bankruptcy Bill (Bill C-55)
before the non confidence vote, expected on Monday November 28, 2005.
Bill C-55 was adopted by the House Monday afternoon, November 21, 2005, under a special House Order. The Bill will move to the Senate on Tuesday, November 22, 2005. The intention is to have the Senate complete its examination by the end of the week to enable the Bill to receive Royal Assent before the non confidence vote in the House, expected on Monday, November 28, 2005.
Ramming the bill through like this means that numerous representations made for amendments to the bill are being ignored. The bill was adopted in the Commons with one minor amendment pertaining to collective agreements.
One of the submissions that is being ignored is the one by the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP). The CAIRP would have put forth representations that:
Student Loans laws are still too harsh. The bill, which reduces from 10 years to 7 years the time a student has to wait until his or her debt can be erased, is still too draconian. The CAIRP would have urged that cases of hardship should be dealt with at the bankrupt's discharge hearing, with the court being given express authority under the BIA to grant full or partial relief.
“Under the BIA , student loans are among the few debts that are not erased by bankruptcy,” said Alan Spergel, Vice Chair of CAIRP. “The only others are court-ordered fines for personal injury and wrongful death as well as spousal support orders. It is completely unfair to place former students on the same footing as O.J. Simpson and deadbeat dads.”
Federally prescribed list of exemptions should be established. There should be an optional federally prescribed list of exemptions under the BIA that would
reduce the disparity that currently exists among provincial exemption amounts. This was
recommended by both the Personal Insolvency Task Force and the Senate Committee.
The wide range of exemptions in the provinces and territories can be illustrated by the current
exemptions for equity in homes and vehicles:
Homes:
British Columbia: $12,000 in Capital Regional District or Greater Vancouver Regional District;
$9,000 for rest of province
Alberta: $40,000
Saskatchewan: $32,000
Manitoba: The residence or home, not held in joint tenancy or tenancy in common, of any
judgment debtor other than a farmer, where the value does not exceed $2,500; or where held in
joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the value of interest of the debtor does not exceed $1,500.
Ontario: Nil
Québec: Nil
New Brunswick: Nil
PEI: Nil
Nova Scotia: Nil
Newfoundland and Labrador: $10,000
Yukon, NWT, Nunavut: $3,000
Vehicles:
British Columbia: $5,000 if debtor is not a maintenance debtor under the Family Maintenance
Enforcement Act; $2,000 if the debtor is a maintenance debtor.
Alberta: $5,000
Saskatchewan: Vehicle, if required for work
Manitoba: $3,000 if required to travel to work
Ontario: $5,000
Québec: Nil
New Brunswick: Vehicle, if market value not more that $3,000 and if required in course of, or to
retain employment, or necessary to trade, profession or occupation
PEI: $3,000
Nova Scotia: $3,000
Newfoundland and Labrador: $2,000
Yukon, NWT, Nunavut: Nil
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, November 24, 2005
The Standing Senate Committee on Banking Trade and Commerce
has the honour to present its
SEVENTEENTH REPORT
Your Committee, to which was referred Bill C-55, An Act to establish the Wage Earner Protection Program Act, to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts , has, in obedience to the Order of Reference of Wednesday, November 23, 2005, examined the said Bill and now reports the same without amendment but with observations, which are appended to this report.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerahmiel S. Grafstein
Chair
APPENDIX
Bill C-55, An Act to establish the Wage Earner Protection Program Act, to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
Unanimous observations of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce
The Committee wishes to indicate our disappointment with the process by which the Bill arrived in the Senate. We recognize the extraordinary circumstances that exist with the impending dissolution of Parliament, but believe we had an inadequate opportunity to review comprehensively such an important piece of framework legislation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee has decided to report Bill C-55 without amendment and without having conducted the customary comprehensive study and review. We do so not because we approve of the legislation in its entirety, as drafted, but rather because of three key factors.
First, the Committee unanimously supports and approves of the long-overdue wage earner protection provisions of the Bill and does not wish to delay, or in any way deny – or appear to deny – access to enhanced legislated protection for this vulnerable group of creditors.
Second, the witnesses heard by the Committee, including the Minister of Labour and Housing and the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry, gave unqualified assurance to the Committee, to be confirmed in writing forthwith, that Bill C-55 would not be proclaimed into force prior to 30 June 2006 at the earliest.
Third, the Committee expects that between now and the proclamation of Bill C-55, we will receive a timely Order of Reference that will enable us to undertake the thorough review of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act that would have occurred with respect to Bill C-55 had it been referred to us on a more timely basis.
In connection with the Committee's study in 2006, we look forward to receiving, from Industry Canada officials, the legislative and regulatory changes they undertook to provide to improve Bill C-55 and Canada's insolvency regime more generally. All stakeholders should have an opportunity to share with us their views on key aspects of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act as well as other insolvency legislation. Unfortunately, too few witnesses were heard and there was insufficient study at Committee in the House of Commons during its examination of Bill C-55 which may, in part, explain why obviously needed amendments were not introduced before the Bill was sent to the Senate.
The Committee has in-depth knowledge of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act . In 2002 and 2003 we reviewed these Acts and, in November 2003, tabled our report Debtors and Creditors Sharing the Burden: A Review of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act . In that report, we comprehensively examined and made recommendations respecting the full range of consumer and commercial insolvency issues as well as on administrative and procedural issues.
While the Committee wholeheartedly supports the principle of the wage earner protection regime, even in that instance we have questions. In our view, workers should be compensated in the timeliest manner possible, and we are not certain that the Bill's provisions meet the test of timeliness. For example, we wonder why the administrator is not able to pay the workers immediately, rather than waiting for workers to be paid out of the Wage Earner Protection Program.
Moreover, the Bill contains a number of provisions unrelated to wage earner protection that we believe fall well short of what the Committee wishes to see. In particular, we believe further study is needed in a number of areas to ensure the effectiveness of Canada's insolvency legislation, including:
· the protection, during insolvency and corporate restructuring, of eligible financial contracts in derivatives and other structured transactions
· cross-border insolvencies
· debtor-in-possession financing
· transfers at undervalue and preferences
· executory contracts
· governance
· insolvency of other vehicles, including income trusts
· discharge from bankruptcy, including for students.
These areas, among others, need thorough study and review by the Committee in order to ensure that new insolvency framework legislation goes forward in the proper form.
The Committee notes that we have some experience with delayed proclamation of legislation. A similar approach was adopted in December 1997, when the Minister of Finance delayed the coming into force of the governance and investment provisions of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act until April 1998 in order that we could study them. The Minister also agreed to refer the draft regulations governing the Investment Board to us for review and comment. We believe that this approach was successful then, and will be successful when we have the opportunity to study and review, in a comprehensive manner, the subject matter of Canada's new insolvency framework legislation in 2006.
The Committee continues to believe that the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act constitute critical framework legislation that affect, in a very fundamental manner, the Canadian economy and all Canadians who participate in it. The Committee understands that the appropriate government legislative initiatives will be taken to ensure the foregoing.
..... The letter is addressed to me ( Senator Grafstein) and is dated November 24, 2005. It is under the letterhead of the Minister of Industry, David L. Emerson. Honourable senators, I am prepared to place this on the record of the house with your consent. Allow me to read it in full:
I am writing in response to observations made during your committee's meeting of November 23, 2005 with respect to Bill C-55, an Act to establish the Wage Earner Protection Program Act, to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act and to make consequential amendments. As the Committee noted, the bill is a very important piece of legislation that will have significant impact on the economy, the protection of workers, and the life of many Canadians who face a situation of financial distress.
Bill C-55 contains a comprehensive and balanced reform to Canada's insolvency system. There is very strong and broad support for the policy objectives of the bill, which underscores the importance of securing its adoption by Parliament in a timely manner. However, given exceptional circumstances, the scrutiny of the detailed provisions of the bill has raised a number of implementation issues that deserve further consideration. In this regard, the Government commits not to proceed with the coming into force of Bill C-55 before June 30, 2006. As soon as possible in 2006, the Government, through the Leader of the Government in the Senate, will refer the matter to the committee for further study.
I would like to thank your committee for its diligence and cooperation.
Sincerely, David L. Emerson.
Want to know when there
are changes made to this page?
OTTAWA, June 03, 2005 - It was announced today that the Government of Canada has introduced a comprehensive insolvency reform package in Parliament to modernize the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), as well as to create the legislative framework for the Wage Earner Protection Program (WEPP), announced May 5, 2005.
Most of the major proposed changes are ones recommended in the Senate report; Debtors and Creditors Sharing the Burden: A Review of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, published in November of 2003.
Many of the Senate Committee recommendations, especially regarding consumer debt, have been watered down or not included.
The Senate Committee recommendations were made after hearing from stakeholders from a broad spectrum of interests: insolvency practitioners, representatives of financial institutions, the legal community, labour and business groups, consumer associations and members of the academic community.
Tougher Rules for Individuals
Debtors who have surplus income, in accordance with directives issued by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, will no longer be eligible for an automatic discharge after nine months. They will be required to stay in bankruptcy a further 12 months and to continue making surplus income payments to the trustee. Second time bankrupts, with surplus income, will be required to stay in bankruptcy and make surplus income payments for a total of three years.
Current surplus income payments for 2005/06 are:
One Person - 50% of monthly take home pay in excess of $1,713/mo;
Two People - 50% of monthly take home pay in excess of $2,141/mo;
Family of Three - 50% of monthly take home pay in excess of $2,662/mo;
Family of Four - 50% of monthly take home pay in excess of $3,223/mo.
Family of five - 50% of monthly take home pay in excess of $3,603/mo;
Bankrupt individuals with more than $200,000 in personal income tax debts representing 75 percent or more of their total unsecured debt will not be eligible for an automatic discharge. These individuals will have to seek a Court Order to be discharged of their debts.
Some Good News for Individuals
All registered retirement savings plans and registered retirement income funds will be exempt from seizure in a bankruptcy. Currently only employer sponsored plans and retirement savings plans offered through insurance companies are exempt from seizure.
To prevent abuse, contributions made in the year prior to bankruptcy will not be exempt from seizure.
Student Loans will be eligible to be written off in a bankruptcy if the student has terminated his studies seven or more years ago. This is a decrease from the current ten-year wait. In cases of undue hardship, a bankrupt may apply to court to obtain a discharge of the student loans after five years.
The threshold for filing a consumer proposal is raised from $75,000 to $250,000 of debt, excluding debts secured by the individual's principal residence.
Wage Earner Protection
There will be a guaranteed payment for wages and vacation pay owing, in the six months prior to bankruptcy or a receivership, to a maximum of $3,000 per employee for employees employed more than three months. The Minister of Labour and Housing will make the payments.
Unpaid wages and vacation pay to a maximum of $2,000, will now rank ahead of claims of secured creditors and will be assigned to the Minister of Labour and Housing in return for the payments made to the employees.
Unremitted pension plan contributions by employees will also rank ahead of secured creditors.
Restructuring of Viable but Financially Troubled Companies is Encouraged
In order to promote the restructuring of financially troubled companies the following will be instituted:
Labour contracts can be renegotiated, with the permission of the court, if it can be shown that this is necessary for the preservation of the enterprise;
Contracts with a debtor company may be terminated by the debtor;
Interim Financing may be authorized by the court with a priority ahead of existing secured creditors;
A Stay of Proceedings can be enforced by the court on regulators if the regulators are trying to collect a debt arising prior to the filing for bankruptcy protection;
Judges granted powers, in a restructuring proceeding to;
remove and replace directors;
grant a priority charge to indemnify director and officers against obligations or liabilities that may be incurred; and
provide for the payment of the cost of assisting the effective participation of interested parties at the proceeding.
Trustees, Receivers and Monitors will not be personally liable for liabilities outstanding prior to their appointment. This is being instituted because in some cases trustees will not accept appointments for fear of liability;
Monitors will be required to be trustees in bankruptcy and auditors will generally not be permitted to act as monitors. This will ensure a high level of professionalism and avoid any conflicts of interest an auditor might have.
Some Disappointments
Many of the significant proposed changes affecting consumers, recommended by the Senate Committee in their report of November 2003, have been dropped or watered down in this current bill:
Student Loans - The Senate Committee recommended that student debt be eligible to be erased in a bankruptcy five years after the student completed his or her studies. In cases of hardship the recommendation was that the court be allowed to discharge student loan debt in a period of time shorter than five years where the debtor can establish that the burden of maintaining the liability for some or all of the student debt creates undue hardship.
The current bill states the debt is not eligible to be written off until seven years have passed and court can only review hardship cases after five years.
Most trustees in bankruptcy and insolvency lawyers believe that this proposed amendment should be changed to allow student debt to be erased in the same time frame as all other dischargeable debt. That is, when the bankrupt is discharged.
The law as it stands and the proposed amendment are discriminatory and draconian. It is also in violation of one the major tenets of Canadian bankruptcy - that an honest but unfortunate debtor deserves a fresh financial start.
Federal Exempt Property (Missing from the current bill.) - The Senate Committee recommended that a list of Federal Exemptions be established (assets the bankrupt be allowed to keep in a bankruptcy) and the bankrupt be allowed to choose either the provincial or federal exemptions to apply to his or her bankruptcy. This recommendation was made to even the current system which has the provinces and territories set the exemptions.
An example of the wide range of exemptions in the provinces and territories can be illustrated by the exemptions in effect for equity in a home and a vehicle:
Yukon; NWT and Nunavut: Home = $3,000; Vehicle = NIL;
BC: Home = $12,000 in Vancouver and Victoria and $9,000 in the rest of the province; Vehicle = $5,000;
Alberta: Home = $40,000; Vehicle = $5,000;
Saskatchewan: Home = $32,000; Vehicle = If required for work;
Manitoba: Home = $1,500; Vehicle = $3,000, if required to get to and from work;
Ontario: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $5,000;
Quebec: Home = NIL; Vehicle = NIL;
New Brunswick: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $6,500;
Prince Edward Island: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $3,000;
Nova Scotia: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $ 3,000;
Newfoundland and Labrador: Home = $10,000; Vehicle = $2,000.
Registered Education Savings Plans(Missing from the current bill.) - The Senate Committee recommended that these plans be exempt from seizure so long as the plans were locked in and the funds contributed within the year prior to bankruptcy NOT be exempt from seizure.
Reaffirmation Agreements(Missing from the current bill.) - In some cases a bankrupt would continue making payments on a debt perhaps through error or inadvertence. This could have the effect of reviving the whole debt in spite of the bankruptcy. The Senate Committee recommended that this be prohibited.
Non-Purchase Money Security Interests in Personal Exempt Property(Missing from the current bill.) - This is security given by a debtor to a lender NOT for the purchase of the item (apparel, household furnishings and a vehicle) but to secure a cash loan advanced to the debtor. The Senate Committee recommended that this be prohibited.
Summary of the Major Proposed Changes - Bill C-55 and Bill C-62:
Consumer Issues - Bill C-55
High Income Tax Debt: Bankrupt individuals with more than $200 000 in personal income tax debts representing 75 percent or more of their total unsecured liabilities will not be eligible for an automatic discharge. These individuals will have to seek a Court order to be discharged of their debts. They will have to convince the Court that the relief they are seeking is justified on the basis of their efforts to repay their debts, their financial situation when the debt was incurred and their future financial prospects. The Court will be able to fix conditions on the discharge. Specifically, the Court may refuse to discharge these individuals from bankruptcy, suspend their discharge for a period of time, or require the bankrupt to comply with any requirement as the Court may direct. This is meant to be an anti-abuse measure targeting high-income individuals who may strategically use bankruptcy to avoid paying large income tax debts.
Exemption for RRSPs: RRSP and RRIF exemptions will be in accordance with the laws of the province where the provinces have such exemptions. The provinces that have RRSP and RRIF exemptions are Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.
This wording change will result in the following:
A one year claw back will only be in effect for RRSPs in provinces without RRSP exemption laws;
There will be no upper cap on the amount of RRSPs that can be protected;
There will be no need to set up the RRSPs in a locked in plan to make them eligible for exemption;
The court will have no jurisdiction to extend the one year claw back period period in an appropriate case.
Dollar Threshold for a Consumer Proposal is Raised: A consumer debtor can now be considered for filing a consumer proposal if the individual's aggregate debts, excluding debts secured by the individual's principal residence, are not more that $250,000. This is an increase from $75,000.
Mandatory Surplus Income Payments: Bankrupts will be required to make surplus income payments to the estate in accordance with directives issued by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. Trustees will no longer have the discretion to recommend that a bankrupt should pay less of their surplus income than the amount determined according to the Superintendent's directive. First-time bankrupts with surplus income will be required to make payments for nine months. If, at that end of the nine-month period, the surplus remains, the bankrupt will be required to make additional payments for a further 12 months and for a further time as the Court may order. Second-time bankrupts with surplus income will be required to make payments for 24 months. If the surplus income remains after 24 months, the bankrupt will be required to make surplus income payments for a further 12 months and for such further time as the Court may order. The changes are intended to require bankrupts who have the financial ability to make reasonable contributions to their creditors to do so prior to obtaining their discharge.
Automatic Discharge of Second-Time Bankrupts: Second-time bankrupts will be eligible for an automatic discharge after 24 months from the date of bankruptcy. This measure will only apply to those who have completed mandatory counselling and who have made payments of their surplus income to the creditors. Under the current system, debtors who are bankrupt for the second time are not eligible for an automatic discharge. They must appear before the Court to seek a discharge, even when no opposition has been filed. In some areas, lengthy delays for hearing dates are not uncommon and have caused some bankrupts to wait an unduly long time for a discharge hearing.
Student Loans: Student loan debt will be eligible for discharge in bankruptcy if seven years have passed since the former student has terminated his/her studies. Currently, student loan debt can only be discharged after 10 years from the termination of studies. In addition, in cases of undue hardship, a bankrupt may apply to the Court to obtain the discharge of the student loans after five years. For the Court to discharge on hardship grounds, it must be satisfied that the debtor has acted in good faith and is expected to continue to experience financial difficulties. This amendment complements a variety of programs and services that are available to former students under the Canada Student Loans Program to help them manage their student loan debt when they experience financial difficulty.
Prohibition on Ipso Facto Clauses in Bankruptcy: The amendments place limits on the exercise of "ipso facto" contract clauses in bankruptcy. An ipso facto clause is a contractual term that generally allows a creditor to terminate a contract or a supply of service if an individual enters into proceedings under an insolvency statute. For consumers, the primary concern over ipso facto clauses relates to basic services, such as telephone, gas, electricity and leases. This prohibition exists now in the case of consumer proposals and will be extended to bankruptcy situations.
Commercial Issues - Bill C-55
Unpaid Wages: Claims for unpaid wages and vacation pay in bankruptcy situations will be given a higher priority, above secured creditors. Workers' claims will now have a charge over the current assets (i.e. cash, inventories and accounts receivables) of the bankrupt employer, up to a maximum of $2000. The protection will also be made applicable to receivership and restructuring under both the BIA and CCAA. This new measure is designed to work in tandem with the WEPP.
Wage Earner Protection Program: The WEPP will be established under the responsibility of the Minister of Labour and Housing to compensate individuals for amounts earned, but not paid, during the six months preceding the bankruptcy or receivership of their employers under the BIA. The WEPP will help protect workers by providing a guaranteed payment of wages owed up to $3000 should their employer declare bankruptcy. These payments will be subject to income tax and take into consideration other appropriate contributions. The WEPP recognizes that the present insolvency system lacks an effective mechanism to provide prompt and certain payment of unpaid wages and vacation pay in bankruptcy or receivership situations. No longer will workers' claims depend solely upon the asset value of their bankrupt employers' estates. Where a worker's claim is paid by the WEPP, the worker is required to assign their rights under the BIA to the Crown for amounts paid out under the program.
Pension Protection: Regular pension plan contributions by employees and their employers that are unremitted at the time of bankruptcy or receivership will have priority status, ranking above secured creditors. Moreover, in both the BIA and CCAA, no restructuring proposal or plan can be approved by the Court unless it provides for the payment of outstanding unremitted pension plan contributions and ongoing employer pension plan contributions explicitly protected in the BIA and CCAA, without detracting from protection under pension legislation.
Labour Contracts: The amendments specify that a debtor company can seek a Court order authorizing it to serve a "notice to bargain" on the bargaining agent representing its employees, which would trigger a renegotiation of the collective agreement under the applicable labour legislation. In these circumstances, the company has to satisfy the Court that such an order is necessary for a restructuring of the company, that it has made legitimate efforts to renegotiate the collective agreement with the union, and that the failure to do so would lead to irreparable harm to the employer. The debtor company must provide the union with at least five business days notice before it goes to the Court to seek the order. The existing collective agreement will remain in force unless it is changed by agreement between the parties. Where a collective agreement is revised, the bargaining agent may make a claim, as an unsecured creditor, for an amount equal to the value of the concession.
Treatment of Other Contracts: Contracts with a debtor company may be terminated by the debtor. This applies to all contracts except an eligible financial contract, a commercial lease or a collective agreement. Both the BIA and CCAA would allow for a contract to be disclaimed with notice to the co-party to the contract. The co-party can object and ask the Court to determine whether the disclaimer is appropriate in the circumstances. Where a contract is disclaimed, the co-party has a claim for damages as an unsecured creditor. While the courts generally allow for the disclaimer of contracts, these new rules add consistency and predictability to the process. They also provide some recourse for the co-party for the value of the disclaimed contract. The amendments also provide for the assignment, under the Court's supervision, of certain contracts to a third party.
Interim Financing: The reforms expressly provide that the Court may authorize interim financing to the debtor company during the restructuring process with a priority ranking ahead of existing secure lenders. In exercising its discretion, the Court has to consider certain factors before authorizing interim financing (e.g. trustworthiness and competency of management; whether the debtor has the confidence of major creditors; the expected length of the restructuring period; the interim financing impact on the prospects of a successful reorganization; the nature and value of the insolvent person's assets; and whether any creditors will be materially prejudiced during the proceedings as a result of the continued operations of the insolvent person). Troubled companies often require interim financing to continue operations. Although interim financing is regularly granted, there are no provisions governing how the financing is authorized, resulting in some uncertainties. These amendments will provide the necessary legislative guidance to ensure predictability.
Regulatory Measures: The Court would have the authority to enforce a stay of proceedings on regulators if the regulators are acting as creditors trying to collect a debt that has accrued prior to filing for bankruptcy protection by the debtor. In addition, the debtor could apply to the Court, with notice to the affected regulator, to obtain a stay against any action of the regulatory body if it is appropriate and is necessary for a viable proposal. This amendment balances the requirement to have debtor companies in reorganization proceedings comply with all applicable laws and regulations, as their solvent competitors would be expected to do, without unduly limiting the prospects of legitimate reorganization attempts.
CCAA Process and Oversight: Companies filing under the CCAA will be required to publish notice of the CCAA proceeding in a newspaper shortly after the process has been initiated. The notice must include information concerning the application as well as contact information for the creditors. In addition, notice of any hearing must be given to each known creditor if their rights as creditors would reasonably be expected to be affected. Furthermore, the monitor must prepare a list of all known creditors of the company, who have a claim against the company in excess of $1000, and make the list publicly available. In addition, a central registry of applications made under the CCAA will be created at the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. As well, the Superintendent will have oversight powers with respect to monitors appointed to CCAA cases similar to that which currently exists for bankruptcy trustees under the BIA.
Governance: The judge in a restructuring proceeding is given explicit authority to deal with governance issues to foster the possibility of a successful reorganization. This includes the power to remove and replace directors; the ability to grant a priority charge to indemnify directors and officers against obligations or liabilities that may be incurred; and the authority to provide for the payment of costs for assisting the effective participation of interested parties at the proceeding. Claims relating to the purchase of equity interests in the company do not qualify for voting on the proposal or arrangement.
Trustees, Receivers and Monitors: The amendments clarify that trustees and receivers are not personally liable for liabilities outstanding prior to their appointment. Currently, trustees and receivers are sometimes unwilling to act in insolvency files where they may be exposed to liability for outstanding obligations of the debtor. The amendments remove this disincentive and will improve the administration of both the BIA and the CCAA. As well, under the CCAA, monitors will be required to be licensed as a bankruptcy trustee. Auditors will generally not be permitted to act as monitors and the duties of the monitor will be better defined. The amendments also clarify the role and responsibilities of interim receivers, and provide that they can operate across Canada. This avoids the requirement to appoint a separate receiver in each province where a debtor may have assets.
UNCITRAL Model Law: The amendments include new provisions to facilitate cooperation with foreign jurisdictions in international insolvency cases based upon the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law. The Model Law attempts to promote international cooperation in transborder insolvency in three major ways: by authorizing the courts to coordinate and cooperate with each other; by restricting the scope of local bankruptcy proceedings when foreign proceedings have commenced; and by granting local relief to representatives of foreign proceedings. Canada has been active in the development of the provisions contained in the Model Law. Adopting the Model Law will encourage consistent administration of international insolvencies, and provide an effective mechanism to deal with globalization of economic activity and the increase in insolvencies with international dimensions. The UNCITRAL Model Law was recently adopted by the United States.
Other Issues - Bill C-55
Professional Conduct:The professional conduct and discipline provisions applicable to trustees in the BIA will be clarified, notably by prescribing a code of ethics, reinforcing investigatory powers of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy and the application of conservatory measures. Trustees acting as monitors under the CCAA will also be made subject to the supervision of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.
Technical Changes:Several technical amendments will be made to modernize the law and clarify interpretation of the courts in order to ensure its effective application.
Recommended Changes to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act
Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce
November, 2003.
The page reference following each recommendation is to the Committee's Report
(You will need the Acrobat Reader to read this Report. You can get a free Acrobat reader by clicking on the Acrobat icon)
Recommendations for Consumer Insolvency:
Federal Exempt Property:
1. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Regulations be amended to provide a list of federal exempt property. The debtor should be required to choose, at the time of filing for bankruptcy and in its entirety, either the list of federal exempt property or the list of provincial/territorial exempt property available in his or her locality. The value of the property in the list of federal exempt property should be increased annually in accordance with increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price
Index. (page 23)
Exemptions for RRSPs and RESPs:
2. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to exempt funds in all Registered Retirement Savings Plans from seizure in bankruptcy, provided that three conditions are met: the Registered Retirement Savings Plan is locked in; contributions made to the Registered Retirement Savings Plan in the one-year period prior to bankruptcy are paid to the trustee for distribution to creditors; and the exempt amount is no greater than a maximum amount to be set by regulation and increased annually in accordance with increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index. (page 29)
3. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to exempt funds in a Registered Education Savings Plan from seizure in bankruptcy, provided that two conditions are met: the Registered Education Savings Plan is locked in; and contributions made to the Registered Education Savings Plan in the one-year period prior to bankruptcy are paid to the trustee for distribution to creditors. (page 32)
Reaffirmation Agreements:
4. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to prohibit reaffirmation by conduct or by express agreement. (page 36)
Summary Administration:
5. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be reviewed in order to eliminate all unnecessary procedural requirements and to provide parties to a bankruptcy with an opportunity - to the extent possible - to choose their level of involvement in accordance with a "by exception rather than by rule" approach. Moreover, the use of electronic communication should be encouraged in order to simplify and expedite the insolvency process. (page 39)
Non-Purchase Money Security Interests in Personal Exempt Property:
6. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to prohibit non-purchase money security interests in property that would otherwise be exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. Property should be defined to include exempted property intended for use or consumption by the debtor or the debtor's family, and should encompass apparel, household furnishings and motor vehicles owned by the debtor. (page 42)
Mandatory Counselling:
7. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to require the completion of mandatory counselling by first-time and second-time bankrupts as a condition of automatic discharge from bankruptcy available after 9 and 21 months respectively. Debtors making a consumer proposal should also undertake mandatory counselling. The nature and timing of mandatory counselling should be examined to ensure its effectiveness. (page 45)
Consumer Liens:
8. The issue of consumer liens continue to be addressed within provincial/territorial consumer protection legislation. (page 47)
Student Loans:
9. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to reduce, to five years following the conclusion of full or part time studies, the length of time prior to permitting the potential discharge of student loan debt. As well, the Act should allow the Court the
discretion to confirm the discharge of all or a portion of student loan debt in a period of time shorter than five years where the debtor can establish that the burden of maintaining the liability for some or all of the student debt creates undue hardship. (page 56)
Discharge from Bankruptcy and the Treatment of Second-Time Bankrupts:
10. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide automatic discharge from bankruptcy after 21 months for second-time bankrupts who have completed mandatory counselling. The Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the trustee or any interested party should have the opportunity to oppose the automatic discharge, in
the same way that the discharge of a first-time bankrupt can be opposed, thereby requiring a Court hearing. (page 59)
Contributions of Surplus Income to the Bankrupt's Estate:
11. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to require bankrupts with surplus income to contribute to their estate for a total of 21 months. Trustees should have the discretion to permit a shorter contribution period in cases of undue hardship. Surplus income should continue to be determined in accordance with the directive of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. The discharge of the debtor should not be delayed merely because of the obligation to continue to contribute for a total of 21 months. In appropriate circumstances, a trustee should be able to seek a summary judgment to require such payments. (page 62)
Voluntary Agreements to Make Post-Discharge Payments:
12. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to allow trustees to enter into voluntary payment agreements with bankrupts who do not have surplus income. Fees payable to the trustee in accordance with such an agreement should not exceed the minimum legal amount established for summary administration bankruptcies. (page 65)
Non-Dischargeable Credit Card Purchases:
13. The matter of purchases by the debtor of luxury or non-essential goods and services shortly prior to filing for bankruptcy continue to be decided either during the course of a discharge hearing or through an accusation of fraud. (page 67)
International Insolvency:
14. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to recognize the effect of a foreign discharge or compromise of debt with respect to an individual, provided certain conditions are met. The conditions should be: the bankrupt foreign resident Canadian has a real and substantial connection with the foreign jurisdiction; the foreign procedure is fair and non-prejudicial to creditors; and the personal exemptions used by the bankrupt foreign resident Canadian in the foreign proceedings are substantially similar to those in Canada. (page 70)
Debt Forgiveness by the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency:
15. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide that, for consumer proposals, the year-end date for income tax purposes is the date on which the proposal is filed with the Official Receiver. For commercial proposals, the year-end date should be the earlier of: the date of filing of the notice of intention to file a
proposal; and the date of filing of the proposal with the Official Receiver. Moreover, the Income Tax Act should be amended to ensure that the debt forgiveness provisions in Section 80 of the Act are not applicable to individuals who file proposals under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. (page 73)
Ipso Facto Clauses:
16. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide that ipso facto clauses in agreements for basic services are not enforceable with respect to consumer proposals and consumer bankruptcies. (page 75)
Credit Reporting:
17. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy take a leadership role in convening a meeting among credit granting agencies, credit grantors, provincial/territorial representatives and other relevant parties with a view to negotiating a mutually acceptable credit scoring regime. (page 79)
Inadvertent Discharge of Selected Claims in Proposals:
18. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to ensure that an insolvent debtor will not be released from the debts and liabilities referred to in Section 178 of the Act unless the holder of those debts provides affirmative and informed consent. (page 81)
Bankruptcy and Family Law:
19. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to:
ensure that bankruptcy does not prevent a claimant from recovering the total amount of support arrears from a bankrupt spouse; clarify that only Court orders made under Section 68 of the Act have priority over enforcement of spousal and child support against the bankrupt's income during the period of bankruptcy; provide that bankruptcy does not stay or release any claim for equalization or division against exempt assets under provincial/territorial legislation regarding equalization and/or the division of marital property; exclude, from assets vesting in the trustee, the right to sue the bankrupt's spouse for equalization or division of property under provincial/territorial matrimonial property law; and
add, to the debts that survive bankruptcy, a debt for equalization or division of property under provincial/territorial matrimonial property law, to the extent that the debt arises from malicious or fraudulent dissipation or concealment of property by the bankrupt. (page 86)
Recommendations forCommercial Insolvency:
Compensation Protection: Wages and Pensions:
20. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide that unpaid claims for wages and vacation pay arising as a result of an employer's bankruptcy be payable to an amount not to exceed the lesser of $2,000 or one pay period per employee claim. The funding of these claims should be assured by creating a super
priority over secured claims to inventory and accounts receivable. The secured creditor or creditors should be able to assume the rights of the employees against the directors. (page 96)21. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act not be amended to alter the treatment of pension claims. (page 99)
Debtor-in-Possession Financing:
22. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to permit Debtor-in-Possession financing. The Court should be given the jurisdiction to provide that the lien by the Debtor-in-Possession lender can
rank prior to such other existing security interests as it may specify. As well, any secured creditor affected by such priority should be given notice of the Court hearing intended to authorize the creation of security ranking prior to its security. In deciding whether to authorize a Debtor-in-Possession loan, the Court should be required to consider the seven factors outlined by the Joint Task Force on Business Insolvency Law Reform in its March 2002 report. (page 103)
The Rights of Unpaid Suppliers:
23. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to repeal, subject to the noted exception, the provisions that provide protection for unpaid suppliers of goods to bankrupt companies. The provisions that protect the rights of farmers, fishers and
aquaculturalists as suppliers should be retained. (page 111)
Cross-Border Insolvencies:
24. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to incorporate the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Consideration should be given to adding a reciprocity provision
and provisions that would assure the creation of a creditors' committee, consisting of Canadian creditors, to protect their interests. The reasonable expenses of the members of this committee should be paid by the foreign debtor, if considered
appropriate by the Canadian Court. (page 117)
Director Liability:
25. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to include a generally applicable due diligence defence against personal liability for directors. (page 120)
Transfers at Undervalue and Preferences:
26. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to ensure consistent and simplified rules for challenging fraudulent preferences, conveyances at undervalue and other reviewable transactions. A
trustee/monitor under a proposal should have the same powers as a trustee in bankruptcy. The Acts should provide a standard for challenging transactions that may affect the value of creditors' realizable claims. (page 123)
Bankruptcies by Securities Firms:
27. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to clarify:
the definition of "net equity;" the status of cash in the accounts of bankrupt securities firms; and
the applicability of Part XII of the Act to electronic transactions. (page 125)
Financial Market Issues:
28. The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to give the Court the right to exempt securities regulators from Court ordered stays of proceedings in instances where two conditions are met:
the exemption is needed for the protection of third parties; and
the exemption does not subject directors or senior management to undue pressure and loss of time. (page 127)
Insolvency Practitioner Liability as a Successor Employer:
29. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to separate clearly the personal liability of an insolvency practitioner from the liability of the debtors' estate. (page 130)
Executory Contracts:
30. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to permit disclaimer of executory contracts in existence on the date of commencement of proceedings under the Acts. This disclaimer should apply to all executory contracts, provided a number of conditions are met. In
particular: the debtor should be obliged to establish inability or serious hardship in restructuring the enterprise without the disclaimer; the co-contracting party should be permitted to file a claim in damages in the restructuring; and, where a collective
agreement is being disclaimed, the debtor should also have the burden of establishing that post-filing negotiations have been carried on, in good faith, for relief of too onerous aspects of the collective agreement and should establish in Court that the disclaimer is necessary in order to allow for a viable restructuring.
(page 137)31. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to permit trustees, Court-appointed receivers and monitors, if authorized by judgment, to assign executory contracts when appropriate, in connection with going concern transactions and on a liquidation basis, provided
that two conditions are met:
the proposed assignee is at least as credit worthy as the debtor was at the time the contract was entered into; and
the proposed assignee agrees to compensate the other party for pecuniary loss resulting from the default by the debtor or give adequate assurance of prompt compensation. (page 138)
Workers' Compensation Board Premiums:
32. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act not be amended to alter the treatment of Workers' Compensation Board premiums. (page 143)
Interim Receivers:
33. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to clarify the role of the interim receiver, and the duration and meaning of the term "interim." As well, the definition of "receiver" should be amended to include interim receivers when they operate in a
manner similar to Court-appointed receivers. (page 145)
Going Concern and Asset Sales:
34. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to permit the debtor, subject to prior approval of the Court, to sell part or all of its assets out of the ordinary course of business, during reorganization and without complying with bulk sales legislation. Similarly, the debtor should be permitted to sell all or substantially all of its assets on a going concern basis. On an application for permission to sell, the Court should take into consideration whether the sales process was conducted in a fair and reasonable manner and whether major creditors were given reasonable notice, in the circumstances, of the proposed sale and had input into the decision to sell. No such sale to controlling shareholders, directors, officers or senior management of the debtor having a
significant financial interest in the purchaser or in the sales transaction should be permitted, other than in exceptional circumstances. (page 148)
Governance:
35. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to permit the Court to replace some or all of the debtor's directors during proposals or reorganizations if the governance structure is impairing the
process of developing and implementing a going concern solution. Moreover, prior to appointment, a trustee/monitor should disclose, to the Court, any business and legal relationships it has or has had with the debtor. The auditor or recent former auditor of the debtor should not be permitted to be the monitor. Furthermore, the monitor should not be permitted, in the event of a failed restructuring, to become the trustee or a receiver for a secured creditor. (page 150)
Plan Approvals:
36. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to require a trustee/monitor to provide, in connection with a request for Court approval of a reorganization plan, an opinion that, as a group, each of secured creditors and unsecured creditors are likely to receive no less under the plan than it would receive in a liquidation. Moreover, Section 54(3) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act regarding related parties should be incorporated in the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act. Finally, the Acts should be amended to provide the Court approving a reorganization plan with the power to approve a restructuring of the equity of the debtor, with or without shareholder approval. (page 152)
Priorities:
37. The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to incorporate the priority rules in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. (page 153)
Insolvency of Other Vehicles:
38. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to provide for the liquidation or the reorganization of a business trust. (page 155)
Income Tax:
39. The Income Tax Act be amended to provide that distress preferred share treatment for tax purposes be afforded to qualifying debt, for a specified period of time, by filing a notice of election with the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency.
Moreover, on the consummation of a plan of arrangement, a debtor should be able to elect to use fresh start accounting for tax purposes, with tax obligations relating to the period prior to the date of bankruptcy addressed as pre-filing claims. (page 157)
Subordination of Equity Claims:
40. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide that the claim of a seller or purchaser of equity securities, seeking damages or rescission in connection with the transaction, be subordinated to the claims of ordinary creditors. Moreover, these claims should not participate in the proceeds of a restructuring or
bankruptcy until other creditors of the debtor have been paid in full. (page 159)
Administrative Tribunals and Stays of Proceedings:
41. The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be amended to exempt, from the application of stays of proceedings and subject to Court discretion, all proceedings brought before non-judicial administrative tribunals. The exemption should be granted where two conditions are met: the exemption is needed for the protection
of third parties; and the exemption does not subject directors or senior management to undue pressure and loss of time. (page 162)
Recommendations on Administrative and Procedural Issues: Volume of Filings, Access to the Process and Funding of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy:
42. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be reviewed in order to identify opportunities that will contribute to greater efficiency within the insolvency system, including efforts regarding the adoption of new technologies. (page 167)
43. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide the Superintendent of Bankruptcy with the authority to finance research and education programs from the account which contains unclaimed dividends and undistributed funds. Amounts that are unclaimed or undistributed after a two-year period should be used
in this way. (page 169)
Consolidation of Insolvency Statutes:
44. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act continue to exist as separate statutes. (page 173)
Statutory Review of Insolvency Legislation:
45. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, the Winding-Up and Restructuring Act and the Farm Debt Mediation Act be amended to require a review by a Parliamentary committee at least once every five years. (page 176
)A Specialized Judiciary:
46. The federal government consult with relevant stakeholders with a view to developing education and training programs that would enable judges in Canada to develop specialized expertise in the area of insolvency law. (page 180)
Issues of Costs:
47. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to repeal the Tariff of Costs. Instead, costs should be paid in accordance with civil Court tariffs as they apply from place to place throughout Canada. (page 183)
Conflicts of Interest:
48. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act be reviewed in order to identify and eliminate any opportunities for the roles and responsibilities of insolvency practitioners to place them in a real or perceived
conflict of interest. Moreover, in order to ensure that all practitioners fulfill their duties with a high level of integrity, the federal government should adopt guidelines for insolvency practitioners regarding professional conduct and conflicts of interest, expanding upon Rules 34 to 53 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act where appropriate. (page 185)
The Definition of Income:
49. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended in order to clarify the meaning of the term "total income." As well, clarity in the form of guidelines contained in a directive of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy - should be provided to trustees
regarding the manner in which lump-sum settlements received after bankruptcy and before discharge should be divided between debtors and creditors. Finally, a bankrupt's tax refunds received during a period to be determined by statute should be made available to the trustee for distribution to creditors. (page 189)
The Definition of Consumer Debtor:
50. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to raise the indebtedness threshold contained in the definition of "consumer debtor" to $100,000, with annual increases thereafter to reflect increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index. Moreover, two years after the new indebtedness threshold
comes into force, the federal government should initiate a review of the degree to which insolvent debtors are using the consumer proposal option rather than pursuing a commercial reorganization. (page 190)
Selection of the Bankruptcy Trustee:
51. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide that the debtor is required to submit to the Official Receiver his or her choice of a trustee to administer his or her bankruptcy. (page 193)
Non-Arm's Length Creditor Voting Rights:
52. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to provide voting rights to non-arm's length creditors who have been dealing with the debtor at non-arm's length in the year prior to the bankruptcy, if they represent together more than 40% of the value of the total claims. In the event that the non-arm's length creditors vote changes the outcome of the vote, any interested party should then seek leave of the Court to have the vote included. (page 196)
Debts Not Released by an Order of Discharge:
53. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act be amended to require that fraud be proven in order for a debt to survive discharge from bankruptcy. Moreover, the provisions should apply to both debts for property and debts for services acquired through false pretences or fraudulent misrepresentation. (page 198)