Canadian Bankruptcy Reform: Bankruptcy Exemptions – Bankruptcy Canada Blog.

Changes are required in the bankruptcy exemptions, to correct the unequal treatment of Canadians based on their province or territory of residence.

ThemisThe new bankruptcy laws, which were rushed into law on November 25, 2005, just before the defeat of the Liberal government on November 28, 2005, will not come into force until June 30, 2006 at the earliest. The Senate was promised the opportunity to review the legislation and hear the scores of experts and special interest groups who were scheduled to make submissions. There is the hope that this flawed legislation will not be enacted without significant changes.

Bankruptcy exemptions or the assets a bankrupt is allowed to keep in a bankruptcy were established as part of the philosophy that an honest but unfortunate debtor deserves a fresh financial start. It was recognized that in order to promote a fresh financial start the bankrupt had to maintain a degree of dignity and be allowed to keep some equity in key assets so he and his family would have a starting point from which to rebuild their financial lives. In Canada it is the provinces and territories that set the exemptions. Over time and because there was no great incentive for the provincial and territorial politicians to address this issue the exemptions have, for most jurisdictions, become out of date, inadequate and unfair.

The current law and the laws passed on November 25, 2005 but not enacted do not address this unfairness. This results in unequal treatment of Canadians based on their province or territory of residence.

An example of the wide range of exemptions in the provinces and territories can be illustrated by the exemptions in effect for equity in a home and a vehicle:

• Yukon; NWT and Nunavut: Home = $3,000; Vehicle = NIL;

• BC: Home = $12,000 in Vancouver and Victoria and $9,000 in the rest of the province; Vehicle = $5,000;

• Alberta: Home = $40,000; Vehicle = $5,000;

• Saskatchewan: Home = $32,000; Vehicle = If required for work;

• Manitoba: Home = $1,500; Vehicle = $3,000, if required to get to and from work;

• Ontario: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $5,650;

• Quebec: Home = NIL; Vehicle = NIL;

• New Brunswick: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $6,500;

• Prince Edward Island: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $3,000;

• Nova Scotia: Home = NIL; Vehicle = $ 3,000;

• Newfoundland and Labrador: Home = $10,000; Vehicle = $2,000.

If we look to our US neighbours the Canadian exemptions are even more out of line. The following list is in order of real estate exemption amount from lowest to highest. Even the states with the lowest real estate exemptions ($5,000.00) rank ahead of every Canadian province and territory except for BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan.

State / Exemption for a home:
AL / $5,000
KY / $5,000
MD / $5,000
OH / $5,000
SC / $5,000
VA / $5,000
GA / $10,000
WY / $10,000
NE / $12,500
IN / $15,000
MO / $15,000
AR / $18,450
DC / $18,450
FED / $18,450
MI / $18,450
NJ / $18,450
PA / $18,450
NC / $18,500
UT / $20,000
LA / $25,000
OR / $25,000
WV / $25,000
HI / $30,000
MN / $30,000
SD / $30,000
IL / $30,000
WA / $40,000
WI / $40,000
CO / $45,000
CA / $50,000
DE / $50,000
ID / $50,000
NY / $50,000
AK / $67,500
ME / $70,000
CT / $75,000
MS / $75,000
VT / $75,000
ND / $80,000
NH / $100,000
AZ / $150,000
MN / $200,000
RI / $200,000
NV / $350,000
MA / $500,000
FL / $UNLIMITED
IA / $UNLIMITED
KS / $UNLIMITED
MT / $UNLIMITED
OK / $UNLIMITED
TN / $UNLIMITED
TX / $UNLIMITED

The above exemptions were provided by BankruptcyAction.com. There are federal and state exemptions in the United States. Some of the states allow their residents to choose between the federal and state exemptions. Our list uses the higher real estate exemption where the state allows a choice.

Recommendations:
The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Regulations be amended to provide a list of federal exempt property. The debtor should be required to choose, at the time of filing for bankruptcy and in its entirety, either the list of federal exempt property or the list of provincial/territorial exempt property available in his or her locality. The value of the property in the list of federal exempt property should be increased annually in accordance with increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index.

The Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals; CAIRP, has recommended a national set of exemptions.

The Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce November, 2003, recommended that a national set of exemptions be established.

6 Responses to “Canadian Bankruptcy Reform: Bankruptcy Exemptions – Bankruptcy Canada Blog.”

  1. Trustee says:

    There is another practical reason for increasing the bankruptcy exemptions, especially real estate, and this is that higher exemptions encouraging enterprise.

    A research study by Wei Fan and Michelle White published in the Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 46:2, October 2003 found that locations with more lenient bankruptcy rules have higher levels of self-employed individuals, meaning that these regimes encourage enterprise. America’s liberal business bankruptcy laws are repeatedly cited as a factor in the US’ prodigious advantage over Europe in entrepreneurship.

    The Wei Fan and Michelle White study concluded that families who are homeowners are about 35 percent more likely to own businesses if they live in states with high or unlimited rather than low real estate exemptions, and the difference is statistically significant. Renters are 29 percent more likely to own businesses if they live in high-exemption states, and this difference is also statistically significant.

  2. GERARD says:

    In regards to the above I believe that the basic Bankruptcy law should be the same for the country as a whole. However as we are a very regional country it would be best for the goverments of the day to modify the basic law of the land to the provinces specific needs. However, I believe it should not be too generous as this would increase the Personal Credit Losses for many lending institutions and would make credit harder to obtain.

    I have two questions, regarding bankruptcies. The first is in regards to the province of Quebec. A loan has a borrower and a co-borrower signed of the loan document. One of the signees has filed bankruptcy and a creditor has filed the proof claim regarding the debt. Is it true that all co-signors are now free of the debt. I heard that this was a judgement in a recent court ruling from the Belle province? Could you please confirm as I have serched through the many websites for quebec bankruptcies but i have not been able to find this.

    My second question has to do with exemptions in particular with cars: If a client buys a car for 10,000 dollars and after 3 years the client has filed bankruptcy. If there is an exemption for the vehicle of 3000 dollars and the value of the vehicle is 2500 does that mean the creditor can not pick up the car as it is within the exemption limit?

    Using the example above if the vehicle is seized by the creditor and sold for 6000 dollars would this entitel the debtor to the exemption amount of 3000 or would this amount be paid to the trustee to be distributed amongst the other creditors or be paid directly to the debtor?

  3. David Green says:

    When, oh Lord, will the reforms previously known as Bill C55, now Chapter 47, RSC, be declared. Many of us are hanging on by our teeth, not wanting to lose our only remaining assett – our RRIF or RRSP, which Federal civil servants with their generous indexed pensionplans are protected from losing.

    THE GOVERNMENT HAS DRAGGED ITS COLLECTIVE HEELS LONG ENOUGH. IT IS TIME FOR ACTION – OR A NEW GOVERNMENT WHICH WILL TAKE ACTION!

  4. theresa sew says:

    My daughter qualified for the mortgage on my home and transfered te title to me 17 months after she filed for bankruptcy Can the trustee take or lein my home
    My daughter never lived in the home did not pay mortgage or tax

  5. Blogs ou should be reading…

    [...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……

  6. angela savard says:

    I purchased a a second home using equity from my first home My daughter helped me by using her income to qualify the mortgage .I later assumed the mortgage and my title was changed back to me.I bought my house back with no money transfering hands except 1.00.Seventeen months later my daughter and her husband filed a babkruptcy and the trustee had a lis pendens put on my house.I have already wasted 10,000 in legal fees without a solution What seemed a simple thing has turned into my nightmare.
    My daughter never lived at the property never paid the bills on the property she was just holding it in trustf or me./Its now 4 years later and my daughter has yet to get her release.What can I do Anyone out there have a legal mind ??I have been waiting 3 years for a reply

Leave a Reply