Credit Counsellors under Scrutiny.
Canada’s Office of Consumer Affairs is undertaking the funding of a study on Credit Counsellors in order to ensure that consumers are well served and to reduce the risk of fraud or conflict of interest. Consumer Affairs was prompted to take this step by the widespread abuses of the credit counselling industry in the United States. The study will be conducted by L’Union des consommateurs.
Their analysis will focus on the following points:
o cost of credit counselling;
o sources of funding;
o policy on the allocation of payments to creditors;
o existence of a consumer awareness program;
o nature and size of the business;
o annual volume of counselling sessions;
o training required or offered to credit counsellors;
o rules of ethics;
o existence of and participation in a national association.
L’Union des consommateurs have stated that they will call on members of Credit Counselling of Canada for assistance in identifying the agencies to be targeted and finding pertinent local legislation and major legal precedents.
It is unfortunate, that by seeking cooperation with members of Credit Counselling of Canada, that there appears to be a bias by
L’Union des consommateurs towards non-profit credit counsellors. This built in bias will mar the credibility of L’Union des consommateurs report, especially with the latest news coming out of the US on May 15, 2006 about the widespread abuses by non-profit credit counsellors.
The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reported on May 15, 2006 that, the audits of 41 organizations, representing more than 40 percent of the revenue in the industry, have been completed. All of the completed audits have resulted in revocation, proposed revocation or other termination of tax-exempt status.
RAMPANT ABUSE BY CREDIT COUNSELLORS IN THE UNITED STATES
Credit Counsellors Controlled by Credit Card Companies:
Steve Rhode, president and co-founder of Myvesta issued a statement on November 20, 2003 on the Credit Counseling Hearing Held by The Subcommittee on Oversight of the Committee on Ways and Means. Amongst other things, he said that credit counsellors were controlled by the credit card companies.
“Back-Office” Servicing Companies are Threatening to Change the Industry into a Debt Collection Mill:
In March 2004, the United States Senate tabled a report entitled Profiteering in a non-profit industry: Abusive practices in credit counseling. The report contains stories of abuses committed in the United States in the field of support services for consumers in debt. The Committee reported that the proliferation of for-profit, “back-office” servicing companies is threatening to change the industry into a debt collection mill instead of an industry whose focus should be on consumer counselling and education.
Consumers Deceived into Paying at Least $170 Million in Hidden Fees:
On March 21, 2005 the Federal Trade Commission issued a statement that one of the largest non-profit credit counselling firms in the US, AmeriDebt Inc., will shut down its debt management operation as part of a settlement of Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived consumers into paying at least $170 million in hidden fees.
Attorney General Jay Nixon of Missouri, in announcing the lawsuit, filed in St. Louis Circuit Court against non-profit credit counsellor AmeriDebt, said that:
“…AmeriDebt has served more as an anchor than a life preserver for many consumers. “
IRS Takes New Steps on Non-Profit Credit Counseling Groups Following Widespread Abuse:
The IRS announced on May 15, 2006 that over the past two years, the IRS has been auditing 63 non-profit credit counseling agencies, representing more than half of the revenue in the industry. To date, the audits of 41 organizations, representing more than 40 percent of the revenue in the industry, have been completed. All of the completed audits have resulted in revocation, proposed revocation or other termination of tax-exempt status.
“Over a period of years, tax-exempt credit counseling became a big business dominated by bad actors,” said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson.
“We are taking the unprecedented step of contacting every known organization in the tax-exempt credit counseling world to determine if there are further problems. And we are issuing guidance to assist those smaller organizations who do play it straight and want to continue to stay on the right side of the law.” Everson said.
In addition, the IRS has tightened up its review of new applications by credit counseling firms for tax-exempt status. Since 2003, about 100 applications have been reviewed, but only three have been approved.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR CANADIAN DEBTORS CONSIDERING USING A CREDIT COUNSELLOR?
Canadian debtors who are considering using a credit counsellor should take the precaution of getting a second opinion from a trustee in bankruptcy or an insolvency lawyer.
Trustees will give a free consultation with no obligation to use their services. Insolvency lawyers will charge you for 1 – 1 ½ hours of their time but it will be money well spent for your peace of mind and potential savings of thousand of dollars.
Here are some things to be aware of when dealing with credit counsellors:
• Credit counsellors that advertise as “non-profit” are funded by banks, credit card companies and other credit grantors and therefore have a conflict of interest. Be careful! Their mandate is to steer people away from going bankrupt or filing a proposal. Be skeptical and you decide if they are giving the best advice for you and your family or the best advice for their sponsors the banks, credit card companies and other credit grantors.
• Setting your monthly payments too high is common. We find that the Industry Canada Standards on required payments in a bankruptcy or a proposal are very accurate in establishing the maximum payments that should be made. You can calculate your maximum monthly payments by filling in this predictor.
• Setting a payment plan for an extended period of time such as five or more years is common. This is almost always a very bad idea for you. Most trustees in bankruptcy feel that the term should be a maximum of three to four years. It is a stipulation in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act that the term for a “Consumer Proposal” be no more than five years. Terms longer than this have a very high failure rate, because people cannot see a “light at the end of the tunnel”.
• Some credit counsellors just want to charge you for filling out bankruptcy forms and referring you to a “very good” bankruptcy trustee. Don’t pay anyone for doing this! All bankruptcy trustees have the same code of ethics and the same costs and will all give you the same service.
• Some credit counsellors may try to mislead you by saying that their services will give you a better credit rating than a bankruptcy and that a bankruptcy or a proposal will ruin your credit rating. Don’t be fooled! Any kind of a payment plan or bankruptcy or a proposal will be flagged by the credit bureau and will be a negative on your credit bureau report.
• Some credit counsellors may try to frighten people into using their services by saying how terrible bankruptcy is. Don’t be misled by these bankruptcy myths.
